sustainability advertising
This is the Creative Wonders weblog. Feel free to join our discussion groups about enlightening ideas that work, advertising and lifestyles of health and sustainability.
-
Links
-
Previous Posts
- When marketing budgets are lim...
- Build your small business for ...
- Is your business struggling in...
- WE ARE THE ONES WE'VE BEEN WAI...
- SPREAD THE WORD
-
2010 Archives
- Guerilla Marketing: The Advert...
- The Art of Communication
- The Kidney Foundations, ‘Kidne...
- ScrapArtsMusic – Imagination S...
- STEVE AND BILL
-
2009 Archives
- It's A Wrap - Not.
- We're proud innerpreneurs!
- The proof is in the research: ...
- Sam's Halloween Rant
- The 2009 Extra Awards
- Lululemon: Right idea. Wrong c...
- Who gets the credit for creati...
- Paper Inspiration
- Is VANOC Copyright Crazy?
- Meet Google's smarter sibling!
-
2008 Archives
- To advertise or not to advert...
- TMScripter is a software progr...
- The telemarketing industry is ...
- In 2005 Bedtime used a broadca...
- Another resource for you: http...
- Telemarketing: a sure way to a...
- One Sheet Wonders
- One of the most important item...
- What is the Story of Stuff?
- Fun Images for a New Year
-
2007 Archives
- 8 Coolest green gadgets
- Right Brain vs Left Brain Crea...
- Now this is a great way to adv...
- Wake Up: A Guide to Living You...
- 2006 - Stop cooking with Chees...
- Real Age Calculator
- Treasure hunting in an outdoor...
- The truth about recycling
- What is Corporate Social Respo...
- Don't judge a book by its cove...
-
2006 Archives
- Creative Wonders Acknowledged ...
- I met Joe Vitale at a Ho ?opon...
- Creative Wonders welcomes Moni...
- Sheep and Yaks?
- Yup, the ad was done in my cou...
- Cars, Planes, Busses and Boats...
- Air instead of Gas?
- Aspartame-Sweet Side Effects
- The Vancouver Convention Centr...
- HO'OPONOPONO: A story of heali...
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Is VANOC Copyright Crazy?
As the Olympics draw closer, so do the many controversies surrounding it. One more quiet issue is the question of copyrights. VANOC and the IOC have trademarked words and numbers such as games, gold, silver, sponsor, Vancouver, medals, tenth, 10th, 2010 and 21st. What? They own numbers now? I don't think I'm okay with that. I'm also not okay with their ownership of "With Glowing Hearts," the slogan for the games, taken from our national anthem.
The Copyright Act protects all original works upon creation and the Trademark Act protects any term, symbol, design, or combination for any business or organization. I think my issue is that none of these are original creations. The Nike swoop, original. McHappy, original. Medal? Silver? Sponsor? These are just words in the dictionary. And borrowing the slogan from our national anthem, well that's just lazy.
The argument, of course, is that these laws are in place to protect the profit-making opportunities of VANOC. Sure, they're the organizers, but should they be the only ones to profit from an event which will affect our entire city? After all, their ability to host the games requires the use of infrastructure paid for by Canadian citizens and businesses. What would be so wrong with other individuals and businesses also profitting financially? I realize that's a naive question, but the paranoia of the Olympic Committee (can I say that?) has also become laughable.










